Part of what frustrates me so much about watching the ongoing antics of the ‘truth movement’ is that variations of ideas and approaches which been tried already are continually being repackaged and resold to a fresh crop of naive yet mostly well-meaning people as the solution that will save us all from the predicament we are in.
It has become clear that a large number of those who have achieved prominence within it either don’t care about how the movement looks or whether or not is ultimately successful - or, perhaps, have even been put in place precisely to make sure that it is not.
I believe that the, genuine, truth movement - simply put those men and women who care about the future and want to ensure it is a decent one - continues to exists IN SPITE of the grotesque circus of grifters, narcissists and time wasters that supposedly represents them.
If you have taken part in much of the local and national activity that arose as a response to the state’s covid coup in 2020 then you will perhaps have noticed the seemingly total lack of urgency concerning our dire predicament which prevails amongst a large percentage of the ‘truther’ types who have gradually come to monopolise the movement.
At the same time the most ludicrously ineffective (and often even downright counterproductive) ‘outreach’ activities are met with great bouts of self-congratulation. Anyone who criticises these approaches or tries a different approach is dismissed as being ‘negative’ or else undermined by fundamentally unserious people who have infinite time to waste and little to no concern about achieving any real change.
Bring up Flat Earth or ‘Common Law’ or (at one point) ‘snake venom’ however and suddenly the room (or park) will be full of passionate debate and discussion, with each truther trying to outdo the next in advancing their own unique interpretation of what is ‘really going on’ - the more outlandish and implausible the better.
Don’t get me wrong, there is a time and a place for discussing more esoteric matters and there certainly are many, many aspects of our reality that we do seem to have been misled about (to put it mildly!) But these thing shouldn’t be allowed to monopolise anywhere near the time and energy that they have done, let alone, in many cases, to totally eclipse more urgent and immediate matters - whilst a great deal of the more outlandish theories should arguably be kept well away from any public facing efforts altogether.
On the local level it could be argued that, especially in the early phases of the covid coup, this state of affairs was simply a result of large numbers of people coming together to try and make sense of an apparently crazy situation (with many only having just ‘woken up’ as a result of the ‘pandemic’ and thus being particularly open to receiving more ‘truth’ whilst lacking the experience and discernment to spot obvious frauds and fakes in the process.)
But, as more time passed without any meaningful progress being made and with what (in the case of my local group) looked like increasingly organised attempts to monopolise activity by a suspiciously organised and co-ordinated group of outwardly ‘go with the flow’ type hippies, I began to seriously doubt that this was all just innocent bumbling.
Whatever the real reason might be for the descent of many local dissident groups into little more than ineffective social gatherings, there can be no doubt that the failures on the national level were, at least in part, deliberate. When it comes to the figureheads of the ‘movement’ as a whole, the majority of whom have done this all at least once already (in the period around 9/11 and the 2008 financial crisis) and must KNOW that this approach leads nowhere, there can only be two explanations - they are either stupid or they are compromised (in addition, with some individuals there may also be financial and even social motives for keeping up the charade).
It is somewhat forgivable for those who only ‘woke up’ as a result of the events of 2020 to have become overwhelmed by the online conspiracy noise and led into blind alleyways by charlatans. But those who have been ‘awake’ since 2008 or the Iraq war or even earlier and who have seen the entire New Age ‘truther’ movement appear and vanish away several times already, with virtually none of its grandiose claims and predictions having come true, cannot, at this point, truly believe we are going to win by adopting any of its strange utopian ‘solutions’ or by endlessly debating whatever its particular obsession du jour happens to be.
(By the way if you look back at the conspiracy radio shows from around 2008, you will find that there was a similar amount of pointless ‘noise’ being generated then, although most of the specific topics of supposedly vital importance were completely different - at that time planet X, big foot, and the Jesuits were more in vogue for example. It is also interesting to note that some of the main psyops were already being pushed even then - fake ‘common law’ being one of the most obvious ones.)
As in 2008, a great deal of this shockingly blasé and over-confident attitude in the face of looming technocratic slavery seems to stem from the ‘truth movement’s’ narrative that we are perpetually on the cusp of some monumentous turn-around (that is where it doesn’t come directly from new age beliefs that literally discourage any critical thinking as ‘negative’ and thus create an ever more hysterical forced ‘positivity loop’ amongst those who remain faithful to them.)
On the contrary, as the covid coup so clearly demonstrated, the state currently feels itself more powerful than ever and has good reason to do so. Society is being dismantled on every possible level with scarcely any serious pushback from the population at large. Indeed the majority of the population simply continue on obliviously as their economy is repeatedly shocked by unnecessary lockdowns, the middle class is squeezed out of existence and vast sums are spent on unnecessary foreign wars that threaten, eventually to spill over into Western Europe itself, all whilst our ‘caring’ government is busily shipping in hordes of fighting age young men to be stationed across the country, including in abandoned military bases…
As a result of the public’s apathy to this sustained assault upon it, those who have appointed themselves our rulers have become so arrogant and confident that they now openly discuss their most outrageous agendas - removing of animal protein from our diets, mass replacement migration, destroying the family and even the basic distinctions between the two genders - in our newspapers and on our television screens (but of course the new agers have an answer for this as well - the elite are actually panicking and ‘rushing’ the agenda because we are on the cusp of the Great Awakening don’t you know!)
If we are to stand any chance of effectively pushing back against this at all we need focus and clarity.
We need to be hyper focused on the problem we face, our own situation and what effective actions we can take. (This should all be common sense but it seems to me that one of the main points of the entire ‘truther’ psyop is to effectively steer well-meaning people away from such a common sense approach into ever more ridiculous and impossible positions without them ever becoming aware of the process.)
We need to decide what level of granularity we require when it comes to understanding the system and what our ‘red lines’ are in terms of allying with other groups in order to achieve our aims (and which of these aims can be realistically achieved in a short timeframe as well).
I believe that this necessary focus can only be attained by truly understanding the situation we are actually in.
Although the Q-anon movement ultimately turned out to be a gigantic psyop itself, I do believe its adherents were nonetheless light-years ahead of the new age type ‘truthers’ when it came to the overall stakes of the struggle we are all engaged in and the evil nature of our opposition (although when it came to specifics they were often led to truly bizarre conclusions).
To compare the two groups: The one (new age) believes that everything is a single unified experience and that evil and good are just two sides of the same grey coin (mannnn) and that we are all on our ‘own journey’ so its pointless getting too worked up about organised criminals who are trying to drive us all into a new, technocratic global slavery - let’s just do a little more shadow work on ourselves first instead!
The other (Q-anon types) believe that truly evil and ruthless criminal networks have usurped power in the West, that they will stop at nothing to hold onto their power and that they must be resolutely opposed by every means possible if humanity itself is to survive with even a semblance of its former freedom.
Unfortunately, this realisation, on the part of the Q-anoners, was then used to whip them up into a state of hysteria for political purposes that, to me at least, still remain somewhat opaque (most probably it was done to make Trump’s supporters look ridiculous/dangerous but there could be more to it than that).
Still, I have no doubt that, generally speaking at least, they were a lot closer to the truth than the new age ‘truther’ crowd who have achieved precisely nothing in their, far longer, existence save for alienating a lot of people who might potentially have joined us.
Ultimately the Q-Anoners were right about the nature of the system we face and its truly evil actions, as well as what it is capable of if threatened.
Without understanding what we are up against and what the system’s likely responses to our actions is going to be (and how far it is prepared to go) we are simply walking blindly into a trap.
This is why I now have such contempt for the ‘common law’ cultists (specifically the charlatans/assets who lead the whole debacle). It isn’t a matter of disagreement about certain, supposed, historical, legal and moral facts - but, rather, of opposing the spreading of a provably wrong model of how the world works to a movement that needs, above all else, to be firmly based in reality if it wants to stand even the slightest chance of success.
Although a great many of the specific details of the ‘conspiracy’ remain confusingly and often maddeningly contradictory, it is nonetheless clear that we are facing ruthless criminals who have committed unimaginable crimes and who possess resources far in excess of anything we could even imagine: how could we possibly defeat them without even having a clear view of who we are fighting?
If you have the stomach for it, I would recommend that anyone who still disagrees to first go off and read about the Belgian ‘Dutroux Affair’ - in a nutshell the accidental expose of what looked like a truly demonic pedophile ring which implicated the very highest authorities in Belgium and which was, ultimately, hushed up again by the authorities in that country, in spite of massive public strikes and widespread media coverage. Afterwards feel free to come back and tell me how the ‘elite’ have to respect ‘common law’ gibberish or, indeed, to obey any code whatsoever, whether moral, legal or supernatural, in their activities.
We are clearly in something of a lull right now - for whatever reason those behind the covid coup have, temporarily, backed off again - but that is no reason to be complacent.
Now is the best time to do the work that should have been done during the height of the covid coup - to create a genuine opposition movement that is capable of standing up against the state and the criminal networks behind it. An opposition movement which has, at last, been completely purged of the various shills, narcissists and agents who have, so far, prevented us from achieving the results we could and should have done.
So-called statuary law of the UK isn’t even valid. So what do you suggest? Roll over and let the criminal low-lives do as they please? At the very least, so-called common law holds the irrefutable legal title of our conscious conduct. Otherwise we condemn ourself to mindless evolution of nothing but an empty void. If so, our very existence should end now!
Could you name a couple of the people in the common-law camp that you're criticizing, just so I know what the reference is to. I imagine you aren't talking about William Keyte, but maybe you are. Are you talking about the 23 barons who invoked section 61 of the Magna Carta back in 2001 against Queen Elizabeth for betraying her coronation oath?