13 Comments
Oct 8, 2023·edited Oct 8, 2023Liked by Charlie O'Neill

When I became aware of Common Law about 3 years ago I was very sceptical - silly to think it would make an adversary to back off! Thanks for these great and helpful articles.

I found you via (your comment under) Miri AF's article, which I'd recommend to people, she gives some current impactful examples. https://miri.substack.com/p/the-law-giveth-and-it-taketh-away/comment/41388344

(I wonder should there be a NOT in "2 Maximilien Robespierre - although please note that I am suggesting his approach was the correct one either!" ?.)

Expand full comment
Jun 28, 2023Liked by Charlie O'Neill

Why does the majority cling to a legal, fictional identity when they don’t even own the identity? It is very easy to prove we don’t own these legal fictional identities. Common law can only work if the majority realise the difference, that the entire legal system that rules /controls is fraudulent.

Expand full comment
Feb 14, 2023Liked by Charlie O'Neill

Uncomfortable reading for a naïve newbie dissident like myself in both essays. The common “law gurus” have been hard at work in my area and lead many down a useless and costly path. However, a small but solid group has emerged and we are learning quickly. With help from people like yourself Charlie we are starting to win some battles.

Expand full comment
Jan 18, 2023Liked by Charlie O'Neill

This, and part 1 - most excellent analysis, thankyou...

Expand full comment
Dec 26, 2022Liked by Charlie O'Neill

This was exactly why Robert Mernard's worldfreemensociety forums died. Never mind Robert's methods which didn't work, and repeatedly stirred up drama and controversy with the powers-to-be. The forums got infiltrated and repeatedly derailed. The infiltrator was even made a moderator. That's where everyone got chased off the forums.

Expand full comment